The Trust Score for AI Agents.
We test AI agents against real tasks, document where they fail, and publish buyer-friendly verdicts before you trust them with your work.
AgentVerdict is in public build mode.
Initial agent pages are live, benchmark suites are published, and verified scores will replace provisional scores as controlled test runs are completed. Watch the work happen.
Every score is backed by tasks we publish in advance — not vibes.
Inputs, outputs, costs, and failure tags. The receipts are public.
Sponsors can pay for testing. They cannot buy the verdict.
Highest provisional scores right now
Find an agent for your job
Agents that write, edit, and ship code.
Agents that navigate the web on your behalf.
Agents that wire up workflows across your tools.
Agents that gather, cite, and synthesize.
Agents that prospect, qualify, and follow up.
Agents that triage and resolve customer tickets.
Agents that query data and surface answers.
Agents that produce and repurpose content.
Build your own agent without writing code.
Eight axes. Two tiers. Zero hand-waving.
Every Verdict Score (0–100) sums eight sub-scores covering task completion, accuracy, autonomy, reliability, speed, cost, safety, and operator UX. A score is verified only after a full benchmark suite has been completed against the agent.
Read the full methodology →- Elite90–100
- Strong80–89
- Useful but limited70–79
- Risky / inconsistent60–69
- Not trusted yet0–59
New verdicts in your inbox, weekly.
One short brief. The new agents we tested, the failures worth knowing, and the agent we'd actually pay for this week.